7 Common Hebrew Roots Claims About Christmas: What Scripture and History Actually Show
Examining Christmas trees, December 25, pagan origins, biblical feasts, and Christian freedom.
Every Christmas season, familiar questions resurface.
Is Christmas really a pagan holiday? Does Jeremiah condemn Christmas trees? Did Christians borrow December 25 from Roman sun worship? And if God commanded Israel to observe certain festivals, is it sinful for Christians to celebrate a holiday Scripture never commands?
These questions are particularly common in some Hebrew Roots and Torah-observant communities, where believers emphasize the continuing importance of the biblical festivals and Old Testament commandments.
The concerns deserve a thoughtful response.
After all, Christians should take God’s commands seriously. We should reject idolatry, examine our traditions, and refuse to place human customs above Scripture.
But we must also be careful not to turn historical speculation into established fact—or personal convictions into commands Scripture does not give.
Not everyone associated with the Hebrew Roots movement holds the same beliefs. Our purpose isn’t to dismiss people who raise these questions, but to examine the claims themselves.
Let’s consider seven common objections to Christmas, looking at what Scripture teaches, what history establishes, and where legitimate questions remain.
1. Does Jeremiah 10 Forbid Christmas Trees?
At first glance, the description may sound familiar. But context matters.
Jeremiah is warning Israel against adopting the idolatrous religious practices of surrounding nations.
In Jeremiah 10:3–5, a craftsman cuts wood, shapes it into an object, decorates it with precious metals, and secures it so that it will not fall. The resulting object cannot speak, walk, help, or harm anyone.
Why?
Because Jeremiah is describing a manufactured idol.
The surrounding verses reinforce this interpretation. Jeremiah contrasts the powerless gods of the nations with the living and eternal God (Jeremiah 10:6–16).
A similar description appears in Isaiah 44:9–20, where a craftsman uses part of a tree for firewood and fashions another part into an object of worship.
The issue isn’t simply cutting down or decorating wood. It’s worshiping something human hands have made.
A modern Christmas tree is not automatically an idol because it is decorated. However, Christians should still be careful about the place traditions occupy in their lives.
Read also: Jeremiah 10:1–16; Isaiah 44:9–20.
2. Does God Forbid Celebrations He Never Commanded?
This argument raises an important question: Does Scripture prohibit every religious commemoration that God has not explicitly commanded?
Consider two examples.
Purim: A Celebration Established in Esther
Esther 9:20–28 describes the establishment of Purim, an annual celebration remembering the deliverance of the Jewish people.
Mordecai and Esther instructed the Jewish community to commemorate these events, and the people accepted the observance.
Purim was not one of the festivals originally commanded in Leviticus 23.
Nevertheless, the book of Esther presents its establishment positively.
Hanukkah: The Festival of Dedication
John 10:22–23 places Jesus in Jerusalem during the Festival of Dedication, commonly known as Hanukkah.
This festival commemorated the rededication of the Jerusalem temple following its desecration in the second century BC.
Hanukkah was not one of the annual festivals commanded through Moses.
John does not explicitly say Jesus participated in every festival custom or formally endorsed its observance. However, the passage establishes that this later Jewish commemoration was part of the religious setting in which Jesus ministered.
What About Deuteronomy 12?
Deuteronomy 12:29–32 warns Israel against adopting the worship practices of surrounding nations. Jesus similarly condemns human traditions that undermine God’s commands (Mark 7:6–13).
These warnings must be taken seriously.
However, we should distinguish between introducing practices that contradict God’s commands and voluntarily remembering something God has done.
Choosing to remember Christ’s birth is not the same as claiming God has commanded the church to establish Christmas as a required act of worship.
Purim and Hanukkah do not establish that every human tradition is acceptable. But they challenge the sweeping claim that every annual religious commemoration must have been commanded in Leviticus 23.
For a fuller examination of Deuteronomy 12, human traditions, and Christian freedom, read Can Christians Celebrate Man-Made Holidays Like Easter?
3. If Jesus Wasn’t Born on December 25, Should Christians Celebrate Christmas?
Let’s begin with something important.
We do not know the exact calendar date of Jesus’ birth.
Neither Matthew nor Luke identifies the day or month.
Attempts to calculate His birthday using the priestly service of Zechariah, the shepherds near Bethlehem, or the biblical festivals depend on assumptions that cannot be established with certainty.
Some suggest Jesus was born during the Feast of Trumpets or the Feast of Tabernacles. These proposals may reflect interesting theological connections, but Scripture does not establish either date.
December 25 is a traditional date of commemoration, not a date explicitly revealed in Scripture.
But does that make the celebration sinful?
That conclusion requires another step.
Christians are not commanded to celebrate Jesus’ birth annually. Yet Scripture also does not explicitly prohibit setting aside a day to remember His incarnation.
Romans 14:5–6 discusses believers who regard certain days differently. Although interpreters debate which days Paul has in mind, his teaching emphasizes honoring the Lord while avoiding improper judgment over disputable practices.
This does not authorize every religious custom. It does, however, caution us against treating every difference in calendar observance as disobedience to God.
Why December 25?
The history is more complicated than many popular explanations suggest.
By the fourth century, December 25 was recognized as the date of Jesus’ birth in Rome. Earlier Christian writers also explored chronological calculations concerning Jesus’ conception, death, and birth.
One historical explanation connects December 25 with calculations that placed Jesus’ conception on March 25, nine months before December 25.
Another explanation connects the date with Roman solar symbolism and celebrations associated with Sol Invictus.
Historians continue to discuss the evidence for these explanations.
4. Was Christmas Borrowed from Sol Invictus?
This explanation is frequently presented as established historical fact. However, the surviving evidence tells a more complicated story.
What Does the Ancient Evidence Show?
One of the most important surviving sources is the Chronography of 354, a fourth-century Roman calendar compilation.
It contains two particularly interesting references to December 25.
The Roman civil calendar identifies the date with the birthday of the Unconquered One, accompanied by thirty circus races. Scholars generally understand this as a reference to Sol Invictus.
Another section, known as the Depositio Martyrum, records December 25 as the date of Christ’s birth in Bethlehem.
The Christian calendar tradition preserved in this compilation is commonly associated with approximately AD 336.
Both associations are historically documented.
But the calendar does not tell us which celebration came first or whether one was created to replace the other.
Did Emperor Aurelian Establish the December 25 Festival?
Emperor Aurelian promoted the worship of Sol in AD 274.
However, historian Steven Hijmans points out that there is no firm evidence connecting Aurelian specifically with the establishment of a December 25 festival.
In his 2003 study, Sol Invictus, the Winter Solstice, and the Origins of Christmas, Hijmans challenges the assumption that December 25 was already a major, longstanding Roman solar festival.
Other Roman solar celebrations were better established and, in some cases, more prominent in the surviving evidence.
This matters because a frequently repeated explanation of Christmas assumes Christians deliberately replaced a major pagan festival instituted by Aurelian.
That sequence has not been demonstrated.
Could December 25 Have Developed from Christian Traditions?
Historian Thomas J. Talley offers another explanation in The Origins of the Liturgical Year.
Early Christians developed chronological traditions connecting the date of Jesus’ death with the date of His conception.
In some Western Christian calculations, March 25 became associated with both events.
Nine months after March 25 is December 25.
This provides a possible explanation for how Christians came to associate December 25 with Jesus’ birth independently of a pagan festival.
The exact development of these calculations remains debated, and not every early text used to reconstruct them is equally secure.
Nevertheless, early Christian chronological traditions provide a serious alternative to the claim that December 25 was simply borrowed from paganism.
What About the Winter Solstice?
Hijmans also emphasizes the symbolic significance of the winter solstice.
In the ancient Roman calendar, December 25 was traditionally associated with the winter solstice, when daylight begins increasing.
Christians could naturally connect this symbolism with biblical descriptions of Jesus as the light of the world (John 8:12) and the sun of righteousness (Malachi 4:2).
Such symbolism does not necessarily mean Christians were worshiping the Roman sun god.
What Can We Conclude?
The evidence does not establish that Christmas was simply a renamed pagan festival.
The theory that Christians deliberately appropriated a December 25 celebration of Sol Invictus remains a historical interpretation, not a demonstrated fact.
Neither can we establish that Roman solar symbolism had absolutely no influence on the development of Christmas.
Read our more detailed studies: Was December 25 the Date of Sol Invictus Before Nicaea? and Why Sol Invictus Did Not Come Before Christmas?
These related studies should be read with the historical qualifications discussed above in mind.
5. Are Christmas Trees, Gifts, and Decorations Pagan?
Christmas customs developed across many centuries and cultures.
Some have clear connections to Christian worship. Others reflect European seasonal traditions, family customs, folklore, or broader cultural practices.
The decorated Christmas tree is especially associated with German-speaking regions in the late medieval and early modern periods.
Gift-giving has several historical associations, including the gifts of the Magi, traditions surrounding Saint Nicholas, and older winter customs.
It would be inaccurate to insist that every Christmas custom has an exclusively Christian origin.
But it would be equally inaccurate to assume that every resemblance to an older custom establishes an unbroken connection to pagan worship.
Does a Custom’s History Determine Its Present Meaning?
This question requires biblical discernment.
In 1 Corinthians 8–10, Paul addresses food associated with pagan sacrifices.
His teaching is particularly helpful because he distinguishes between ordinary use of something and actual participation in idolatrous worship.
Paul warns Christians against participating in idolatrous religious fellowship (1 Corinthians 10:14–22).
Yet he also permits believers to eat meat sold in the marketplace without investigating its prior associations (1 Corinthians 10:25–26).
The distinction matters.
Something’s previous association does not automatically determine the spiritual meaning of every subsequent use.
At the same time, Christians cannot justify participating in idolatry simply by assigning it a different name.
Paul’s discussion concerns food and idolatry rather than Christmas itself. Therefore, we should apply the underlying principles carefully rather than treating the passage as direct approval of every holiday tradition.
For a broader examination of common historical accusations, see Top 7 Pagan Christmas Myths.
6. Does the New Testament Require Christians to Observe Biblical Feasts Instead of Christmas?
The biblical feasts are deeply significant.
Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, Weeks, Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, and Tabernacles formed part of Israel’s covenant worship.
They reveal important truths about God’s holiness, provision, redemption, and relationship with His people.
The New Testament also makes meaningful connections between these observances and Jesus Christ.
Paul identifies Christ as our Passover lamb (1 Corinthians 5:7).
He calls the resurrected Jesus the firstfruits of those who have died (1 Corinthians 15:20–23).
Acts 2 records the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.
Studying these festivals can greatly enrich our understanding of Scripture.
For an introduction to their biblical significance, see The Feasts of the Bible: God’s Calendar of Redemption.
But does their significance mean every Christian must observe them?
Didn’t Jesus Say He Came to Fulfill the Law?
Matthew 5:17–19 is central to this discussion.
Jesus did not treat the Law as defective or unimportant. He declared that He came not to abolish the Law or the Prophets but to fulfill them.
Christians disagree about how particular Mosaic commandments apply following Christ’s coming. However, fulfillment should not be confused with declaring God’s earlier revelation worthless.
The central question is how the Law functions within the New Covenant established through Jesus Christ.
Explore Matthew 5:17–20: Jesus and the Law and Do Christians Have to Obey the Law of Moses?
What Does Colossians 2 Say?
In Colossians 2:16–17, Paul tells believers not to allow others to judge them concerning food, drink, festivals, new moons, or Sabbaths.
He then describes these observances as shadows pointing toward Christ.
Some Torah-observant interpreters argue Paul was defending believers who kept the feasts against criticism from outsiders, rather than teaching freedom from the festival calendar.
That interpretation deserves consideration alongside Paul’s larger argument about human regulations and the sufficiency of Christ.
Nevertheless, Paul’s instruction strongly challenges the idea that Christians should be condemned for failing to observe Israel’s religious calendar.
For a detailed examination of both interpretations, read Does Colossians 2:16–17 Command Christians to Keep the Feasts?
What About Romans 14?
Romans 14:5–6 acknowledges differences among believers concerning the significance of particular days.
Paul emphasizes that believers should act in honor of the Lord and according to their convictions.
Interpreters disagree about whether Paul specifically has Jewish festivals, fasting days, or other observances in mind.
Therefore, Romans 14 should not carry the entire argument concerning the biblical feasts. However, it contributes an important principle concerning conscience and improper judgment among believers.
What Did the Jerusalem Council Decide?
Acts 15 is especially important.
Some believers argued that Gentile converts must be circumcised and required to keep the Law of Moses.
The apostles and elders rejected the demand to place that full obligation upon Gentile believers.
Their decision included specific instructions concerning idolatry, sexual immorality, and fellowship within the early church.
The council did not require Gentile Christians to adopt Israel’s complete festival calendar.
Some Torah-observant interpreters point to Acts 15:21, where James notes that Moses is read in synagogues every Sabbath, and argue that Gentiles were expected to learn the rest of the Torah progressively.
However, the verse does not explicitly establish such a program, and this interpretation must be weighed against the council’s rejection of the demand to place Gentiles under the full Mosaic obligation.
Read Moses Is Read Every Sabbath: What Acts 15 Actually Means.
What About the Future Significance of the Feasts?
Some Torah-observant Christians point to Zechariah 14:16–19, which describes the nations celebrating the Festival of Tabernacles in a prophetic vision of the future.
The passage is significant, and its interpretation depends partly on how one understands Old Testament prophecy and its fulfillment.
But even if the passage describes a future observance, that does not automatically establish a present obligation for every Gentile Christian to observe the entire Mosaic festival calendar.
A believer may choose to observe these festivals to remember God’s works and deepen their understanding of Scripture.
However, that personal practice should not become a standard by which every other Christian is judged.
The same principle applies to Christmas.
Christians are free to commemorate Jesus’ birth, but they should not condemn believers who choose not to celebrate it.
For the related question of weekly Sabbath observance, see Do Christians Have to Keep the Sabbath Today?
7. Has Christmas Become Too Worldly to Honor Christ?
Of all the concerns raised about Christmas, this one deserves serious reflection.
Our culture frequently turns Christmas into a season dominated by consumerism, entertainment, financial pressure, and material expectations.
Even Christians can become so consumed with the celebration that they neglect the One they claim to celebrate.
That criticism should not be dismissed.
But does the misuse of a celebration mean every observance of it is sinful?
Not necessarily.
Scripture repeatedly calls God’s people to examine their motives and conduct.
Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 10:31 that whatever believers do, they should do it for God’s glory.
That principle applies to Christmas just as it applies to every other part of life.
A family might use the season to read Luke 2, discuss the incarnation, serve neighbors, give generously, and celebrate God’s grace in sending His Son.
Another family may decide not to celebrate Christmas because of personal convictions.
Neither family should assume its calendar practices automatically demonstrate greater faithfulness to Christ.
The deeper question is whether our choices reflect worship, gratitude, obedience, and love.
So, Is Christmas Sinful for Christians?
After examining these seven claims, several conclusions become clear.
First, Scripture does not command Christians to celebrate Christmas.
We should never treat the holiday as a biblical requirement or measure of spiritual maturity.
Second, Scripture does not explicitly prohibit Christians from commemorating Jesus’ birth.
The New Testament provides principles for evaluating worship, conscience, idolatry, and Christian freedom.
Third, some popular claims about Christmas’s pagan origins go beyond the historical evidence.
We should be cautious about declaring that Christmas is simply a pagan festival in disguise. We should be equally cautious about claiming every Christmas tradition is completely free from historical pagan influence.
Fourth, the biblical festivals remain valuable for understanding Christ.
Christians should study them carefully, recognizing their place in redemptive history without imposing obligations the apostles did not impose upon Gentile believers.
Finally, Christian freedom must be exercised with love.
Romans 14 reminds believers not to despise or condemn one another over matters of conscience.
Some Christians will celebrate Christmas with joy and gratitude. Others will abstain because of sincere convictions.
Our unity is not found in agreeing about December 25.
It is found in Jesus Christ.
The Christmas Question That Matters Most
Perhaps the most important question isn’t whether Christians must celebrate Christmas.
It’s whether we understand and believe the truth Christmas is intended to remember.
The eternal Son of God entered human history.
The Word became flesh and lived among us (John 1:14).
Jesus came to save His people from their sins (Matthew 1:21).
Those truths do not depend on proving a particular birthday or defending every modern Christmas tradition.
They depend on the testimony of Scripture and the historical reality of Jesus Christ.
Christmas is not a biblical obligation. Neither is its observance inherently sinful.
Christians are free to remember Christ’s birth, and they should extend that same freedom to believers whose convictions differ.
Whatever we choose to do, may our desire be to honor the One whose coming changed history.
Grow in Your Understanding of Scripture
Want to go deeper than Sunday morning?
Subscribe to More Than Sunday Mornings for Bible studies, biblical commentaries, Understanding the Bible articles, and discipleship resources to help you grow in your faith.
Sources and Further Reading
The following sources provide historical background, biblical context, and scholarly discussion of the claims examined in this article. Some historical conclusions remain debated, and these works should not be understood as representing unanimous agreement.
Ancient Historical Sources
1. Chronography of 354 — Roman Civil Calendar
A fourth-century Roman calendar containing a December 25 entry associated with the Unconquered One.
Read the ancient calendar transcription
2. Chronography of 354 — Depositio Martyrum
An early Christian commemorative list preserving a December 25 reference to the birth of Christ in Bethlehem.
Read the Christian calendar transcription
Academic Studies on December 25
3. Steven E. Hijmans — Sol Invictus, the Winter Solstice, and the Origins of Christmas
Mouseion, Series III, Vol. 3 (2003), pp. 377–398.
Examines Roman solar worship, the evidence for a December 25 festival, and the development of the Christian Christmas date.
4. Thomas J. Talley — The Origins of the Liturgical Year
Second, emended edition. Liturgical Press, 1991.
Examines the development of Christian festivals, including chronological traditions connecting Jesus’ death, conception, and birth.
Read the relevant section, pp. 79–103
5. Andrew McGowan — How December 25 Became Christmas
Bible History Daily, Biblical Archaeology Society.
An accessible historical discussion of competing explanations for the origin of December 25.
Books on Christmas History
6. Joseph F. Kelly — The Origins of Christmas
Liturgical Press, revised edition, 2014.
Examines the development of Christmas traditions and the historical background of the celebration.
7. Bruce David Forbes — Christmas: A Candid History
University of California Press, 2007.
Explores the historical development of Christmas, including its religious and cultural traditions.
Find the book at University of California Press
8. Andrew B. McGowan — Ancient Christian Worship
Baker Academic, 2014.
Provides broader historical context for early Christian worship and the development of liturgical practices.
Biblical Passages for Further Study
- Jeremiah 10:1–16 — Manufactured idols and the living God
- Isaiah 44:9–20 — The foolishness of idol worship
- Esther 9:20–28 — The establishment of Purim
- John 10:22–23 — Jesus during the Festival of Dedication
- Matthew 5:17–20 — Jesus and the fulfillment of the Law
- Acts 15:1–29 — Gentile believers and the Mosaic Law
- Romans 14:1–13 — Christian conscience and special days
- 1 Corinthians 8–10 — Idolatry, conscience, and Christian freedom
- Colossians 2:16–23 — Festivals, Sabbaths, and Christ
- Zechariah 14:16–19 — The prophetic vision of Tabernacles
Continue Exploring the Biblical Argument
This article provides an overview of seven common objections. For a more detailed examination of the biblical and historical questions, explore these resources from More Than Sunday Mornings.
- Do Christians Have to Obey the Law of Moses?
- Matthew 5:17–20: Jesus and the Law
- Does Colossians 2:16–17 Command Christians to Keep the Feasts?
- Moses Is Read Every Sabbath: What Acts 15 Actually Means
- The Feasts of the Bible: God’s Calendar of Redemption
- Was December 25 the Date of Sol Invictus Before Nicaea?
- Top 7 Pagan Christmas Myths
Explore the entire series: Christmas: Fact, Fiction, Faith — Resource Hub
Leave a Reply